Wealthy individuals are obligated to donate their discretionary income to poverty relief.

Question

Answer

Pro: (P1) A wealth person's donating their discretionary income to poverty relief is morally equivalent to ruining one's clothes to save a child drowning in a shallow pond. ... (P2) Ruining one's clothes to save a child drowning in a shallow pond is morally obligatory. ... (C1) Therefore, wealthy people are morally obligated to donate their discretionary income to poverty relief.

Answer

Con: People are morally permitted to do whatever they want with their money. Wealthy people are no different, so they can do whatever they want with their money. They don't have to donate it to poverty relief.

Answer

Pro: (P1) When wealthy individuals donate their discretionary income to poverty relief, they stop something bad from happening without sacrificing anything equally valuable. ... (P2) If someone can stop something bad from happening without sacrificing anything equally valuable, then they are obligated to do it. ... (C1) Therefore, wealthy individuals are obligated to donate their discretionary income to poverty relief.

Poverty Relief (2022 Central APA)

Wealthy individuals are obligated to donate their discretionary income to poverty relief.

Pros

Cons

People are morally permitted to do whatever they want with their money. Wealthy people are no different, so they can do whatever they want with their money. They don't have to donate it to poverty relief.

Selected thesis

Wealthy individuals are obligated to donate their discretionary income to poverty relief.

Pro claim 1, children below

Pro claim 2, children below

Con claim 1, children below

People are morally permitted to do whatever they want with their money. Wealthy people are no different, so they can do whatever they want with their money. They don't have to donate it to poverty relief.