Humans are better suited to make medical decisions when they require ethical judgements.

Question

Answer

Pro: Humans are able to protest against rules and moral recommendations from bosses and governments that they see as unjust. Such rules will just be programmed into and carried out by the AI systems, making them harder to fight against.

Answer

Pro: It is much less clear who should be held accountable when AI systems make moral or pratical mistakes, making it harder to incentivize close scrutiny of these systems.

Should human doctors be replaced by automated ones? (ANTI-Automation)

Humans are better suited to make medical decisions when they require ethical judgements.

Pros

Cons

Humans are able to protest against rules and moral recommendations from bosses and governments that they see as unjust. Such rules will just be programmed into and carried out by the AI systems, making them harder to fight against.

It is much less clear who should be held accountable when AI systems make moral or pratical mistakes, making it harder to incentivize close scrutiny of these systems.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

Humans are better suited to make medical decisions when they require ethical judgements.

Pro claim 1

Humans are able to protest against rules and moral recommendations from bosses and governments that they see as unjust. Such rules will just be programmed into and carried out by the AI systems, making them harder to fight against.

Pro claim 2

It is much less clear who should be held accountable when AI systems make moral or pratical mistakes, making it harder to incentivize close scrutiny of these systems.