The same report concluded that fracking has "not led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources."

Question

Answer

Con: While the Environmental Protection Agency does estimate that fracking does not pose a significant threat to drinking water, the researchers also admit that they may not have enough data to answer this question correctly.

Should fracking be banned? (Complete Discussion)

The same report concluded that fracking has "not led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources."

Pros

Cons

While the Environmental Protection Agency does estimate that fracking does not pose a significant threat to drinking water, the researchers also admit that they may not have enough data to answer this question correctly.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

The same report concluded that fracking has "not led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources."

Con claim 1

While the Environmental Protection Agency does estimate that fracking does not pose a significant threat to drinking water, the researchers also admit that they may not have enough data to answer this question correctly.