We couldn't say it's either curved or either flat, as we actually don't have the exact % of mass and their values to calculate it. Making therefore both of the answers an hypothesis about universe form.

Question

Answer

Con: With your message you have just said that your partner is not right in her comment and you are saying that there is no way to prove that it is in the shape of a saddle when we are affirming that there are theories that support that the universe is flat

Shape and size of the universe

We couldn't say it's either curved or either flat, as we actually don't have the exact % of mass and their values to calculate it. Making therefore both of the answers an hypothesis about universe form.

Pros

Cons

With your message you have just said that your partner is not right in her comment and you are saying that there is no way to prove that it is in the shape of a saddle when we are affirming that there are theories that support that the universe is flat

Selected claim, opposing its parent

We couldn't say it's either curved or either flat, as we actually don't have the exact % of mass and their values to calculate it. Making therefore both of the answers an hypothesis about universe form.

Con claim 1, children below

With your message you have just said that your partner is not right in her comment and you are saying that there is no way to prove that it is in the shape of a saddle when we are affirming that there are theories that support that the universe is flat