I have a question for you, how do you explain the theory of relativity with a universe in the shape of a saddle? With the absence of gravitational fields and a saddle shape, the planets, satellites, stars... would fall out of the universe

Question

Answer

Pro: I sincerely agree with you Alvaro Einstein proposes that the smallest planets orbited in the largest stars because they made a kind of hole downwards, which with the shape of the saddle is quite difficult since, since there is no flat surface, the stars and planets would slide down

Shape and size of the universe

I have a question for you, how do you explain the theory of relativity with a universe in the shape of a saddle? With the absence of gravitational fields and a saddle shape, the planets, satellites, stars... would fall out of the universe

Pros

Cons

I sincerely agree with you Alvaro Einstein proposes that the smallest planets orbited in the largest stars because they made a kind of hole downwards, which with the shape of the saddle is quite difficult since, since there is no flat surface, the stars and planets would slide down

Selected claim, opposing its parent

I have a question for you, how do you explain the theory of relativity with a universe in the shape of a saddle? With the absence of gravitational fields and a saddle shape, the planets, satellites, stars... would fall out of the universe

Pro claim 1

I sincerely agree with you Alvaro Einstein proposes that the smallest planets orbited in the largest stars because they made a kind of hole downwards, which with the shape of the saddle is quite difficult since, since there is no flat surface, the stars and planets would slide down