You are defending that it is open like a saddle, no closed/spherical, which form are you agreeing with?

Question

Answer

Con: It's a way to defend the form of expasion apart, if this university agrees that theres a curvature in a near future, we would see new theories agreeing on the Curve to a Open Universe.

Shape and size of the universe

You are defending that it is open like a saddle, no closed/spherical, which form are you agreeing with?

Pros

Cons

It's a way to defend the form of expasion apart, if this university agrees that theres a curvature in a near future, we would see new theories agreeing on the Curve to a Open Universe.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

You are defending that it is open like a saddle, no closed/spherical, which form are you agreeing with?

Con claim 1, children below

It's a way to defend the form of expasion apart, if this university agrees that theres a curvature in a near future, we would see new theories agreeing on the Curve to a Open Universe.