I agree with Alvaro because the CMB is a very backed up group and the opinion from one person of a university is not more important than a group of people that have discovered a lot of things related with the universe.So, in fact i think that the CMB has been more recognised than a simple author and scientist.

Question

Answer

Con: It seems you didn't read it correctly, this person is talking based on the OBSERVATIONS OF THE ACIENT LIGHT, more reffered CMB data. Therefore it's not just a single person saying false data, indeed it's an on-going study that turns the study in to a new era.

Shape and size of the universe

Pros

Cons

It seems you didn't read it correctly, this person is talking based on the OBSERVATIONS OF THE ACIENT LIGHT, more reffered CMB data. Therefore it's not just a single person saying false data, indeed it's an on-going study that turns the study in to a new era.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Con claim 1, children below

It seems you didn't read it correctly, this person is talking based on the OBSERVATIONS OF THE ACIENT LIGHT, more reffered CMB data. Therefore it's not just a single person saying false data, indeed it's an on-going study that turns the study in to a new era.