"If you look at data from the Planck satellite, and the 2018 legacy data in particular, it shows that the CMB is being more strongly gravitationally lensed than it should be. The Planck Collaboration called this anomaly Alens, and it's yet to be resolved, but the team believes that one explanation could be the shape of the Universe. "A closed Universe can provide a physical explanation for this effect" This study suggest that the universe would be more likely closed or open than flat

Question

Answer

Con: Your refutation Izam is quite good, however, my friend Sergio is talking about confirmed data when you only refer to beliefs and things that are not confirmed, as is the case of the Alens theory in which you yourself say that it is not confirmed

Shape and size of the universe

Pros

Cons

Your refutation Izam is quite good, however, my friend Sergio is talking about confirmed data when you only refer to beliefs and things that are not confirmed, as is the case of the Alens theory in which you yourself say that it is not confirmed

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Con claim 1, children below

Your refutation Izam is quite good, however, my friend Sergio is talking about confirmed data when you only refer to beliefs and things that are not confirmed, as is the case of the Alens theory in which you yourself say that it is not confirmed