Fossil fuel extraction drives catastrophic climate change in the long term.

Question

Answer

Con: According to a report by the US Department of Energy, a ban on fracking would actually result in increased CO2 emissions.

Answer

Pro: The 2021 report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change declared a "code red for humanity," warning of devastating environmental consequences if fossil fuel emissions are not curbed.

Should fracking be banned? (ANTI-Fracking)

Fossil fuel extraction drives catastrophic climate change in the long term.

Pros

Cons

The 2021 report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change declared a "code red for humanity," warning of devastating environmental consequences if fossil fuel emissions are not curbed.

According to a report by the US Department of Energy, a ban on fracking would actually result in increased CO2 emissions.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

Fossil fuel extraction drives catastrophic climate change in the long term.

Pro claim 1, children below

The 2021 report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change declared a "code red for humanity," warning of devastating environmental consequences if fossil fuel emissions are not curbed.

Con claim 1, children below

According to a report by the US Department of Energy, a ban on fracking would actually result in increased CO2 emissions.