Companies which provide information have taken measures in order to prevent the spread of false information, meaning that facts are promoted to the public (i.e Facebook work with over 60 fact-checking organizations that review content in more than 50 languages.)

Question

Answer

Con: As companies are providing the information, they can skew the information in their favor. As this pandemic is greatly affecting the economy, a company may want to make it seem as though the control is getting better in order to start boosting the economy again.

Answer

Con: These fact checking systems are notoriously unreliable. Although they can correctly identify some misleading information, it is not consistently running and isn't always very effective

Answer

Pro: Although it can be very difficult to be checking the reliability of the information, but Facebook is allowing companies like the WHO to help filtering out the misinformation theconversation.com

Answer

Pro: Fact-checking has aided in the challenge of stifling fiction from being spread through the media yet I believe that checking multiple credible sources (such as WHO) is also necessary.

The media promotes more fiction than fact about contemporary pandemics

Companies which provide information have taken measures in order to prevent the spread of false information, meaning that facts are promoted to the public (i.e Facebook work with over 60 fact-checking organizations that review content in more than 50 languages.)

Pros

Cons

Fact-checking has aided in the challenge of stifling fiction from being spread through the media yet I believe that checking multiple credible sources (such as WHO) is also necessary.

Although it can be very difficult to be checking the reliability of the information, but Facebook is allowing companies like the WHO to help filtering out the misinformation theconversation.com

These fact checking systems are notoriously unreliable. Although they can correctly identify some misleading information, it is not consistently running and isn't always very effective

As companies are providing the information, they can skew the information in their favor. As this pandemic is greatly affecting the economy, a company may want to make it seem as though the control is getting better in order to start boosting the economy again.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Companies which provide information have taken measures in order to prevent the spread of false information, meaning that facts are promoted to the public (i.e Facebook work with over 60 fact-checking organizations that review content in more than 50 languages.)

Pro claim 1

Fact-checking has aided in the challenge of stifling fiction from being spread through the media yet I believe that checking multiple credible sources (such as WHO) is also necessary.

Pro claim 2

Although it can be very difficult to be checking the reliability of the information, but Facebook is allowing companies like the WHO to help filtering out the misinformation theconversation.com

Con claim 1

These fact checking systems are notoriously unreliable. Although they can correctly identify some misleading information, it is not consistently running and isn't always very effective

Con claim 2

As companies are providing the information, they can skew the information in their favor. As this pandemic is greatly affecting the economy, a company may want to make it seem as though the control is getting better in order to start boosting the economy again.