Using automated doctors may be cheaper than using human doctors.

Question

Answer

Pro: Automated doctors may allow hospitals with smaller budgets to reduce expenses by not having to pay salaries for doctors, thereby improving medical access.

Answer

Con: If hospitals become overreliant on automated systems, they become especially vulnerable to outages and technical errors, which dramatically increase costs and productivity.

Should human doctors be replaced by automated ones?

Using automated doctors may be cheaper than using human doctors.

Pros

Cons

Automated doctors may allow hospitals with smaller budgets to reduce expenses by not having to pay salaries for doctors, thereby improving medical access.

If hospitals become overreliant on automated systems, they become especially vulnerable to outages and technical errors, which dramatically increase costs and productivity.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

Using automated doctors may be cheaper than using human doctors.

Pro claim 1, children below

Automated doctors may allow hospitals with smaller budgets to reduce expenses by not having to pay salaries for doctors, thereby improving medical access.

Con claim 1, children below

If hospitals become overreliant on automated systems, they become especially vulnerable to outages and technical errors, which dramatically increase costs and productivity.