Ethical rules and intuitions cannot successfully be formulated in quanitifiable measures.

Question

Answer

Pro: Ethical decisions in medicine often require compassion and a personal understanding of the degree of pain or suffering that patients are experiencing.

Answer

Pro: Everyday moral decision-making often involves complex cost-benefit analyses, which treat individual dilemmas as unique cases. This reasoning cannot be distilled into objective metrics.

Answer

Con: Many moral theories, like utilitarianism and deontology, have fairly strict rules which AI systems can rely on in complicated circumstances.

Should human doctors be replaced by automated ones?

Ethical rules and intuitions cannot successfully be formulated in quanitifiable measures.

Pros

Cons

Ethical decisions in medicine often require compassion and a personal understanding of the degree of pain or suffering that patients are experiencing.

Everyday moral decision-making often involves complex cost-benefit analyses, which treat individual dilemmas as unique cases. This reasoning cannot be distilled into objective metrics.

Many moral theories, like utilitarianism and deontology, have fairly strict rules which AI systems can rely on in complicated circumstances.

Selected claim, opposing its parent

Ethical rules and intuitions cannot successfully be formulated in quanitifiable measures.

Pro claim 1

Ethical decisions in medicine often require compassion and a personal understanding of the degree of pain or suffering that patients are experiencing.

Pro claim 2

Everyday moral decision-making often involves complex cost-benefit analyses, which treat individual dilemmas as unique cases. This reasoning cannot be distilled into objective metrics.

Con claim 1

Many moral theories, like utilitarianism and deontology, have fairly strict rules which AI systems can rely on in complicated circumstances.