Egypt had a very stable society and political system.

Question

Answer

Pro: Mesopotamia frequently had to deal with very destructive floods, which harmed crops and caused hunger.

Answer

Pro: All different types of people were involved in maintaining Egypt's impressive stability.

Answer

Con: Villages in Mesopotamia were the first to cooperate together and form larger city-states. These city-states were more stable in times of crisis, like food shortages or extreme weather.

Answer

Con: Mesopotamia had a clear set of laws in the Code of Hammurabi.

Which Bronze-Age civilization would be better to live in: Egypt or Mesopotamia?

Egypt had a very stable society and political system.

Pros

Cons

Mesopotamia frequently had to deal with very destructive floods, which harmed crops and caused hunger.

All different types of people were involved in maintaining Egypt's impressive stability.

Villages in Mesopotamia were the first to cooperate together and form larger city-states. These city-states were more stable in times of crisis, like food shortages or extreme weather.

Mesopotamia had a clear set of laws in the Code of Hammurabi.

Selected claim, supporting its parent

Egypt had a very stable society and political system.

Pro claim 1

Mesopotamia frequently had to deal with very destructive floods, which harmed crops and caused hunger.

Pro claim 2, children below

All different types of people were involved in maintaining Egypt's impressive stability.

Con claim 1, children below

Villages in Mesopotamia were the first to cooperate together and form larger city-states. These city-states were more stable in times of crisis, like food shortages or extreme weather.

Con claim 2, children below

Mesopotamia had a clear set of laws in the Code of Hammurabi.